Different networks provide positive changes

November 28, 2009 | by Scott A. Winer

O’FALLON, Mo. – Where do I begin? There’s been a lot of interesting television in the last week, and some other intriguing item looking forward.

Late Night

Saturday Night Live delivered one of its best episodes in recent memory. And I have a pretty good memory, particularly with regard to SNL. Beginning with a well-executed cold open and perhaps the most physically demanding monologue since Bill Murray scaled the “Homebase” set 10 seasons ago, Joseph Gordon-Levitt proved himself a more-than-formidable host. Musical guests Dave Matthews Band made yet another appearance on the show. DMB is the only musical act I can think of who’s performances have now spanned the three longest-tenured directors in SNL’s history – the late Dave Wilson (with host Courteney Cox in 1994), multiple appearances with director Beth McCarthy Miller, and now Don Roy King. I have no doubt I’m the only person who really cares.

0

Sports Emmys: My Winners

April 28, 2009 | by Scott A. Winer

LAWRENCE, Kan. – After putting forth my arbitrary list of the best in live television for the past year, I have seen that the Sports Emmy Awards were given out last night. I’ve decided that, since I have yet to look at the winners, I might as well give my picks to a slightly less arbitrary selection.

Here’s a quick digression: I’m sitting in the Kansas Union on the KU campus in Lawrence with ESPN’s newsmagazine attempt, E:60, on a television to my left. I can’t really hear what’s being said. What I can tell is that the film noir pitch meeting footage is horribly over the top, and the camerawork for the interviews in this Stephon Marbury piece is basically what I’d expect from ESPN trying to do break into this genre. Could someone please watch Real Sports or 60 Minutes?! They do it right.

0

The good, the bad and the horrific – Part 1

January 9, 2005 | by Scott A. Winer

SYRACUSE, N.Y. — After my month-long hiatus from writing these little gems because of this thing called college, I have returned with a multitude of material. Perhaps my standards are too high, but I unfortunately have more disappointment to share than elation. Allow me to begin with a critique of ESPN’s Thursday night college football crew. Regardless of how anyone may feel about S.U. alum Mike Tirico’s falsetto touchdown calls, Kirk Herbstreit’s quarterback mentality (not as bad as Joe Theismann) or Lee Corso’s bizarre antics, I have a bone to pick with two men I actually know: Bo Garrett and Mike Schwab, the producer and director, respectively. I don’t care how good a player might be; the nickname “Pacman” is not to be used on graphics in lieu of a kid’s first name. I am quite familiar with West Virginia’s Adam “Pacman” Jones. He was the star running back at Westlake High School, just south of the airport in Atlanta, and my high school football team had the misfortune of crossing his path while I was shooting my second jockumentary, Inside the Game II. He was called “Pacman” then, and he may be called that for the rest of his life. That still doesn’t mean you put it on a graphic. Mookie Blaylock and Tiger Woods are one thing, but “Pacman Jones”? I think not.

0

Quick cuts

November 24, 2004 | by Scott A. Winer

SYRACUSE, N.Y. – Think Outside the Box: For some reason, networks have begun to show a growing number of replays with various split-screen effects. Here’s a thought: STOP! It began with Fox’s baseball coverage in the last few years and can now be seen on some of ABC’s college football telecasts.While some viewers may be able to follow two replays going simultaneously at opposite ends of the screen, no network seems to be able to integrate that with a background that doesn’t look absolutely hideous. Fox used its mind-numbing cookie-cutter shapes rather than simple polygons, and ABC’s background looked so pixelated that it was practically unbearable to watch. Whatever happened to the good ‘ole days when it was sufficient to show the isolated shot of the quarterback throwing and the subsequent pressure from the opposition’s defensive line and then seeing the receivers in isolation from a separate angle. I don’t remember anyone complaining that they couldn’t see both at the exact same time.

0